Suing For Growing Rights – German Cannabis Producers & The Deutsch Klage
December 19th, 2017
Some U.S.-based weed wits have commented over the past year that the development of the German cannabis market (in particular) is years behind American state development. And in some ways that is undoubtedly true – as much as the great green German ganja giant is ever closer to waking up and roaring.
Federal reform can open those doors. And has begun to. And when that happens, change will happen faster here than just about anywhere else than Israel or even Canada.
So far, Germany has done more institutionally to integrate cannabis into federal scheduling and dispensation procedures than any other legalizing country to date. That includes, at least in theory, coverage of the drug under public health insurance.
So what is holding up the show this time?
A great deal of this is supply. There is, as of yet, no formal German domestic cultivation program. It has been proposed, but is so far in limbo due to several legal battles. The last and most serious – which is heading towards a real klage or lawsuit – will be the oral arguments of a German team – Lexamed GmbH which feels it was unfairly left out of the grow bid consideration earlier in the year.
Whether or not they will prevail is an interesting question. And one which will linger at least until December 20 when the oral arguments in the case are heard. If not the formation of the new government after that.
Why Is The Suit Significant?
There are access issues still very much at play on the international scene and the German lawsuit is only one reflection of them. Access being defined by the right to enter the market in the first place, and then by whom?
In Canada that is coming down to the right to sell. In Germany, it is still the right to grow. In the U.S. it is still very much both.
In American states right now, the issue of state-created monopolies is a big one and will probably continue. See Florida, although this is hardly the first state where limited license distribution has been highly controversial.
In many Canadian provinces and some European countries so far, similar limited licensing schemes have now run into lawsuits. In fact, the only European governments so far, which have persisted with a government monopoly on production are Italy and Turkey.
However governments clearly have no intention of opening up cannabis production to just anyone. See Deutschland this past spring. As soon as the grow bid was announced in April, large, deep-pocketed Canadian producers immediately appeared to have been given the upper hand. The bid was written in language which specifically excluded German-only initiatives.
The big stumbling block had mainly to do with previous experience in a federally licensed production environment. That is defendable under both UN regulations and existing and pending trade deals. However, by definition, that also excluded everyone but Canadian, Italian, Uruguayan, Israeli and Dutch growers.
In practice, it actually excluded everyone but the Dutch and the Canadians.
The Deutsch lawsuit will have to convince German judges that growers with no prior experience at this level can meet medical production standards and output requirements now set by the Health Ministry. And that is going to be tough – at least this go round. Especially as it is already widely acknowledged that the official estimates of even immediately qualifying patients are far too low and as a result, the first production quota requirements are too.
However, the suit may well fail for another reason. In addition to experience, there is a need to have a large line of credit. The European market is not cheap. To build, to hire, or to operate in. And German pharma is the deep end of the ocean to begin with when it comes to regulatory process. Cultivation of cannabis has a few more wrinkles thrown on top of that.
The conventional wisdom on the ground at present is that the new government – whatever it might be – will move forward on further reform quickly. Why? It appears that the cannabis question is the only thing all the parties can agree on. That means, in short order next year, a great more clarity on forward motion.
It also means that, given the pressing needs, there will be the awarding of at least several emergency grow licenses to those external companies still interested in the original terms of the bid. However, it will also probably involve a second round of bids that in turn, open the door to domestic production. By all-German firms.
The Growth of Other Cannabis Production Centers & The Rise Of Exports
What all the fuss over procedure has also clearly done is send several firms looking for market presence to other neighbouring countries. It is not too far a stretch to say that new medical production facilities in Portugal, Denmark and Slovenia all saw their genesis this year as a result of the difficulties in obtaining a grow license in Germany.
What the delay over local production has also done is create highly beaten path for import licences instead. And those too so far, appear to have gone to not only Canadian-associated producers (and in the case of Slovenia, an Australian firm), but ones all in line for some kind of production rights as announced by the companies themselves.
Even this slight tempering of the dramatic medical supply shortage now across Europe is still not likely to delay announcement of some forward step in Germany in the beginning of the year. What it has done, however, is firmly establish the right of licensed firms to transport medical cannabis at least across country borders.
And that, no matter how sluggish, old-fashioned and outdated it appears at first blush, puts the EU light years (or at least several years) ahead of the U.S. (and even Canada) on some critical fronts.
It means that medical production is clearly kicking off here for mainstream distribution through the medical system – and across borders. It means that medical users will be the first focus of the cannabis revolution here for years to come.
No matter how “unfancy” or unbranded that might be.
And that, for all its stumbles, falls and flubs to date, is a win for not only patients, but the overall issue of reform and market development beyond that.
This article was published by CFN Enterprises Inc. (OTCQB: CNFN), owner and operator of CFN Media, the industry’s leading agency and digital financial media network dedicated to the burgeoning CBD and legal cannabis industries. Call +1 (833) 420-CNFN for more information.
Follow Us on Social Media
About CFN Media Group
CFN Media Group (CannabisFN), owned and operated by CFN Enterprises Inc. (OTCQB: CNFN), is the leading creative agency and media network dedicated to legal cannabis. We help marijuana businesses attract investors, customers (B2B, B2C), capital, and media visibility. Private and public marijuana companies and brands in the US and Canada rely on CFN Media to grow and succeed.
CFN launched in June of 2013 to initially serve the growing universe of publicly traded marijuana companies across North America. Today, CFN Media is also the digital media choice for the emerging brands in the space.
Disclaimer: Matters discussed on this website contain forward-looking statements that are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such statements. CFN Media Group, which owns CannabisFN, is not registered with any financial or securities regulatory authority and does not provide nor claims to provide investment advice or recommendations to readers of this release. CFN Media Group, which owns CannabisFN, may from time-to-time have a position in the securities mentioned herein and will increase or decrease such positions without notice. The Information contains forward-looking statements, i.e. statements or discussions that constitute predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, estimates, or projections as indicated by such words as "expects", "will", "anticipates", and "estimates"; therefore, you should proceed with extreme caution in relying upon such statements and conduct a full investigation of the Information and the Profiled Issuer as well as any such forward-looking statements. Any forward looking statements we make in the Information are limited to the time period in which they are made, and we do not undertake to update forward looking statements that may change at any time; The Information is presented only as a brief "snapshot" of the Profiled Issuer and should only be used, at most, and if at all, as a starting point for you to conduct a thorough investigation of the Profiled Issuer and its securities and to consult your financial, legal or other adviser(s) and avail yourself of the filings and information that may be accessed at www.sec.gov, www.pinksheets.com, www.otcmarkets.com or other electronic sources, including: (a) reviewing SEC periodic reports (Forms 10-Q and 10-K), reports of material events (Form 8-K), insider reports (Forms 3, 4, 5 and Schedule 13D); (b) reviewing Information and Disclosure Statements and unaudited financial reports filed with the Pink Sheets or www.otcmarkets.com; (c) obtaining and reviewing publicly available information contained in commonlyknown search engines such as Google; and (d) consulting investment guides at www.sec.gov and www.finra.com. You should always be cognizant that the Profiled Issuers may not be current in their reporting obligations with the SEC and OTCMarkets and/or have negative signs at www.otcmarkets.com (See section below titled "Risks Related to the Profiled Issuers, which provides additional information pertaining thereto). For making specific investment decisions, readers should seek their own advice and that of their own professional advisers. CFN Media Group, which owns CannabisFN, may be compensated for its Services in the form of cash-based and/or equity-based compensation in the companies it writes about, or a combination of the two. For full disclosure, please visit: https://www.cannabisfn.com/legal-disclaimer/. A short time after we acquire the securities of the foregoing company, we may publish the (favorable) information about the issuer referenced above advising others, including you, to purchase; and while doing so, we may sell the securities we acquired. In addition, a third-party shareholder compensating us may sell his or her shares of the issuer while we are publishing favorable information about the issuer. Except for the historical information presented herein, matters discussed in this article contain forward-looking statements that are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such statements. CFN Media Group, which owns CannabisFN, is not registered with any financial or securities regulatory authority, and does not provide nor claims to provide investment advice or recommendations to readers of this release. CFN Media Group, which owns CannabisFN, may from time to time have a position in the securities mentioned herein and will increase or decrease such positions without notice. For making specific investment decisions, readers should seek their own advice and that of their own professional advisers. CFN Media Group, which owns CannabisFN, may be compensated for its Services in the form of cash-based and/or equity- based compensation in the companies it writes about, or a combination of the two. For full disclosure please visit: https://www.cannabisfn.com/legal-disclaimer/.